After a Clarity Act funeral, the crypto world would keep turning

If the crypto industry’s Digital Asset Market Clarity Act fizzles in the U.S. Senate, the result may not be fatal, but it’s a heavy blow

The legislation has hit a wall, and the odds of it breaking through get slimmer by the moment. So a new law may not arrive this year to clearly define the distinctions among crypto securities, commodities and other assets, nor who is responsible for overseeing the companies that handle them. And the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission may not get the explicit authority to govern the commodity trading in which the bulk of crypto changes hands.

Before the contentious debates over stablecoin yield, illicit finance and the crypto ethics of government officials threatened to blow up the Clarity Act, the markets-oversight questions were the effort’s core aims. Being unable to put the CFTC in place to supervise the trading of tokens such as bitcoin BTC$65,052.02 and Ethereum’s ether ETH$1,928.71 means a serious chasm in U.S. oversight authority, though the derivatives regulator and its sister agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission, have sought to bandage some of the gaps and will have room to take matters into their own hands if Congress doesn’t act.

That’s what’s likely to be the primary answer in the absence of a crypto law: The crypto-friendly SEC and CFTC continuing to hatch position statements and direct their existing authorities toward granting crypto businesses the powers they need — for now. Some crypto insiders have begun privately shrugging off the potential Clarity loss, arguing that the industry doesn’t require a bespoke law to keep operating in the U.S., despite warnings that crypto companies and developers will move offshore in the absence of the legislation.

The SEC has been holding on to a major policy effort to clear a route for tokenized securities — conceived as a limited sandbox for an idea that could revolutionize the methods and speed in which securities change hands in the U.S. The agency has taken many months longer than it had first signaled, though close observers expect the agency will unleash it in the coming weeks.

It’s also poised to propose its “regulation crypto” rule that’s expected to ease the path for crypto developers, allowing fundraising and relaxed oversight for emerging projects.

However, Chair Paul Atkins has repeatedly expressed how Congress is the only source for permanent, durable policy authority, as he said again in a March speech.

“Only Congress can ensure that regulation in this area is future-proofed through comprehensive market structure legislation,” he said.

The pending SEC moves would follow a spate of guidance from both the SEC and CFTC that has clarified how U.S. crypto efforts can proceed without running afoul of the regulators, whether it’s mining, memecoins, rewards or several other categories. The most important of these regulatory statements emerging from the agencies was the “taxonomy” that sought to carefully define how the regulators would categorize different digital assets, and how those assets would be supervised.

Meanwhile, the banking regulators have been rapidly granting charters to crypto firms, and the Federal Reserve has been working on a tailored access to its payments rails and other services to cut out the banking go-betweens the digital assets players have relied on to serve customers. The new bank charters will have some durability, even when the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency that issues them changes management down the road.

As the Treasury Department and its tax branch, the IRS, also implement crypto-specific policies, the momentum of U.S. regulation becomes increasingly difficult to reverse.

The industry already counted a massive win last year in the passage of the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS) Act. From a dicey 2022 in which crypto crashed and its highest-profile advocate was prosecuted for fraud, the sector turned things around in Washington to get a law governing U.S. stablecoin issuers and — for the first time — officially adding crypto to the regulated financial system.

And though the powerful banking lobby had managed to sway senators from both parties to its view that the Clarity Act needed to include provisions to ban stablecoin rewards programs that might compete with interest-bearing bank deposits, that lobbying campaign may ultimately have proved fatal for Clarity. And if so, banks are left with GENIUS governing such stablecoin rewards, which the crypto industry argues will give it more latitude to actually compete with the traditional-finance stalwarts.

“The bewildering thing about TradFi’s extreme efforts to kill CLARITY is that they are likely accelerating their own obsolescence,” said Miles Jennings, the head of policy and general counsel for a16z crypto, in a Thursday posting on social media site X.

Much of Congress is already favorable toward establishing crypto legislation, as seen in the bipartisan results whenever a bill like GENIUS gets to an actual vote. And the numbers will continue to grow as the industry spends stunning amounts of money on friendly candidates. So Washington is steadily shifting toward positive crypto sentiment that — even in the absence of a crypto market structure law — makes it more difficult for the U.S. government to backtrack on its recent embrace of the industry.

Still, today’s Republican Party dominance, with control over the White House, both chambers of Congress and the Supreme Court, won’t hold. Odds are high that Democrats will retake the U.S. House of Representatives next year, meaning their party would hold all its gavels and subpoena powers.

That’s why some institutional investors and heavyweights in finance hesitate to leap into the digital assets space. A significant slice of cash and financial machinery will likely remain on the sidelines if the industry continues stuttering forward on uncertain legal footing. The risk-averse will continue to see risk that whatever is built on that foundation won’t last.

And further down the road, in the presidential election two years from now, a Democratic victory could repopulate the chairs and directorships of all those regulatory agencies. Statements and guidance are easy to overturn. Policies that have passed through formal rulemaking (with multiple stages and opportunities for the public to weigh in) would be more difficult to erase.

Despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars in political influence and further millions in Washington lobbying, the crypto industry still doesn’t have its marquee U.S. law. And a definitive loss of the Clarity Act — whether decided during the Senate’s limited September window or even in the end-of-year congressional session known as the “lame duck” — could hit the crypto markets with another dip.

But the sector has demonstrated years of patience, and versions of this same legislative push have developed repeatedly, and often with bipartisan energy. The previous Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21) had passed the House in 2024, then the related Clarity Act also passed the House in 2025 before clearing a new hurdle by getting approvals by Senate committees this year. If lawmakers don’t find a way to squeeze it through this year, the market structure bill is likely to emerge again.

Read More: Senate won’t vote on crypto Clarity Act before its summer break