Stellar’s XLM Slips Below Key Support Despite Expanding Institutional Adoption

Stellar’s XLM token slipped below key support in a bout of institutional selling, signaling broader market weakness. Between Sept. 18 at 15:00 and Sept. 19 at 14:00, XLM fell 3.58% from $0.40 to $0.39, with volumes surpassing the 24-hour average of 22.33 million tokens. Analysts pointed to concentrated selling during overnight sessions — traditionally dominated by institutional flows — and the breach of $0.40 support as evidence of repositioning ahead of regulatory clarity.

Despite the pullback, XLM found modest relief in the final hour of trading, eking out a 0.05% gain as buyers defended the $0.39 level. Still, the broader trend remains bearish, with resistance consolidating around the $0.40 threshold where previous rebounds have faltered on elevated volume. Technical analysts warned the pattern of lower highs signals persistent downside pressure.

At the same time, institutional interest in Stellar’s infrastructure continues to grow. The Stellar Development Foundation highlighted adoption during its Meridian conference in Rio de Janeiro, where Centrifuge deployed a $20 million tokenized real-world assets (deRWA) initiative and Mercado Bitcoin announced a $200 million tokenization program. PayPal’s USD stablecoin also went live on Stellar, extending institutional access to the network.

• XLM breached critical support at $0.40 with trading volumes exceeding 22.33 million average.
• Clear bearish trend established with lower highs formation throughout the trading session.
• Resistance levels consolidated at $0.40-$0.40 where recovery attempts faced institutional rejection.
• Intraday volatility reached $0.003 range between $0.39 session peak and $0.39 trough.
• Volume surge to 1.13 million units during selling pressure before institutional stabilization.
• Recovery momentum emerged with 0.05% gain in final 60 minutes of trading activity.

Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.