UniCredit warns Europe may struggle to contain crypto-bank crisis under MiCA rules

UniCredit warns Europe may struggle to contain crypto-bank crisis under MiCA rules

  • News

  • Video

  • Research

  • Events

  • Data & Indices

Finance

Share this article

EU deposit insurance (up to €100,000) may not absorb stress from large stablecoin reserve accounts, unlike the full protection offered by U.S. regulators.

By Francisco Rodrigues|Edited by Nikhilesh De

May 28, 2026, 4:50 p.m. 2 min read

European Parliament building (Guillaume Périgois/Unsplash)
  • Europe lacks crisis tools used by the U.S. to contain crypto-bank shocks, raising concerns about its ability to handle future financial turmoil.
  • EU deposit insurance (up to €100,000) may not absorb stress from large stablecoin reserve accounts, unlike the full protection offered by U.S. regulators.
  • MiCA forces stablecoin providers to align with banks, but without extended deposit insurance, creating a “double weakness” in the European financial system.

Europe may struggle to contain a financial shock tied to crypto firms and banks because its crisis tools are more limited than those used in the U.S. during the 2023 banking turmoil, a senior official with European bank UniCredit said Thursday.

Elena Carletti, UniCredit’s deputy vice chair and head of the board’s risk committee, said European authorities may not be able to guarantee crypto-linked deposits in the same way U.S. regulators did after the collapses of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, Reuters reported.

Speaking at a banking conference hosted by Madrid’s IESE Business School, Carletti said the U.S. decision to protect all deposits, including funds held by stablecoin issuers, helped stabilize crypto markets during the crisis.

“The same decision cannot be easily taken in Europe,” Carletti said.

The comments come as the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation, known as MiCA, pushes stablecoin issuers closer to traditional banks. The rules require certain stablecoin reserves to be held in liquid assets such as bank deposits and government securities.

That link could have become a problem during the Silicon Valley Bank collapse in March 2023. Circle, issuer of the USDC stablecoin, revealed that $3.3 billion of its reserves were held at the bank at the time of the crisis. USDC briefly lost its dollar peg as investors rushed to redeem tokens.

U.S. regulators later guaranteed all deposits at SVB and Signature Bank, including balances above federal insurance limits, helping restore confidence in crypto markets.

Carletti warned that Europe’s deposit guarantee system, which generally protects up to 100,000 euros ($116,500) per depositor per bank, may not be able to absorb similar stress if large stablecoin reserve accounts come under pressure.

“That means that we are forcing a certain alliance of stablecoin and ⁠crypto ​providers with the banking sector without the ​possibility of extending insurance in the same way, and that to me is a double ​form of weakness,” she added.

More For You

By Olivier Acuna|Edited by Jamie Crawley

1 hour ago

Andrew Forson, DeFi Technologies (Olivier Acuna/CoinDesk)

DeFi Technologies president Andrew Forson says the stablecoin layer is thriving, with more than $150 billion in U.S. Treasuries backing coins like USDT and USDC.

What to know:

  • Despite high-profile hacks and a $20 billion drop in total value locked, DeFi advocates argue that critics are overstating security risks and ignoring the sector’s broader growth.
  • DeFi Technologies president Andrew Forson says the stablecoin layer is thriving, with more than $150 billion in U.S. Treasuries backing coins like USDT…


 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *